| 5 months ago :: Nov 07, 2009 - 12:27AM #21 | |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4MCImBLVn0&feature=PlayList&p=4E086F6AB4358B19&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=89
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS0qGi_Spqc "Hands down, Mans down" Dwest refering to himself? "GROUND ZERO" = CLEVELAND BROWNS |
|
| 5 months ago :: Nov 07, 2009 - 10:42AM #22 | |
|
In spurts, we can play LBJ in the 4 position but not the whole 4th quarter. That depends on match ups. We need him to be fresh on the offensive end and not be burdened to guard the 4s of the opposing team. Not a good idea! |
|
| 5 months ago :: Nov 07, 2009 - 10:52AM #23 | |
|
It was either Mark Jackson or Jeff Van Gundy who said they preferred the Cavaliers with LeBron at the 4 with the smaller lineup. I agree with those who say it'll work at times but in no way do I see LeBron at the 4 becoming a permanent thing. Of course I'm the same person who thought we'd hardly see Z and Shaq on the floor at the same time too and look what has happened. I think Z and Shaq together is desperation by Brown but what do I know I'm just a fan.
Bow down before the one you serve your gonna get what you deserve!!!!!
|
|
| 5 months ago :: Nov 07, 2009 - 12:03PM #24 | |
Look at the match ups the other way though. With Lebron at the 4 the other team has to compensate for that. He's not that much smaller than the vast majority of 4's in the league already. At worst he plays average defense against them. But can those same 4's even guard Lebron on the perimeter? Mike Brown needs to be proactive and force matchups in his favor, and no the whole crazy Shaq and Z idea doesn't count, rather than reacting to the other team. |
|
| 5 months ago :: Nov 07, 2009 - 6:05PM #25 | |
|
|

