| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 2:19PM #21 | |
|
concensus says... G-Wallace and McDyess.... let's hope the chips fall that way. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 3:40PM #22 | |
|
i say that the cavs move to being ,if they aren't already, the best team in the East and possibly one of the top three elite between them the Lakers and Boston, if they get both of them. make the call D.Ferry |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 4:05PM #23 | |
|
I personally like Vince Carter. Call me crazy, but before the big three played in Boston many would probably think that Pierce, Garnett, and Allen couldn't all cooperate. Sure Vince Carter typically takes a lot of shots but look at the horrible team he's on. His defense isn't that great but he's got size, maybe under Mike Brown he'd step that up a notch? He also has been quite durable over the last few years, not his whole career, but last few at least. Anyway... heres where i'm gettin. I personally like vince. But most hate him. The Fact is... his contract lasts far too long and we really do not need a SG. Delonte has been absolutely Lights out and we have almost too much depth at SG now. Boobie, Wally, Sasha, Delonte. These 4 are rotating minutes, so it makes no sense in going after yet another guard. McDyess is a perfect fit, and since theres a very good chance he's signing with Detroit (At least thats what his friend Ben Wallace thinks) The only position that we could use at the moment is a PF or even a Center. If We don't McDyess. Im hoping we do a trade involving Wally for Brad Miller. I know there was a thread about this a couple days ago, but that makes a lot of sense. Millers Contract even expires for 2010. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 4:20PM #24 | |
|
I got a SICK feeling Ferry is still looking at him and he will mess this team up! Carter is done! He isn't anything close to what he used to be.. that would ruin the team for YEARS! |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 5:51PM #25 | |
|
Maybe VC has been "durable" for the past couple years, but I have an idea as to why. He doesn't work hard. He rarely attacks the paint lately, and when he does, it's only on iso plays where he knows he isn't going to have a big flying at him to hurt his delicate body. He doesn't rebound as well as his length should dictate and he rarely defends dynamic wing players. His wussy playing style and horrible contract are a terrible fit for this team. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 5:56PM #26 | |
Our #1 priority is NOT a post threat and I'll tell you why:
1. LeBron is a pretty good post threat. He pretty much demands a double/triple team every single time. Duplication of effort.
2. We have the #1 rated offense so far. I know it's early and we are untested, but we already know we need a wing defender. We might not need a offensive post threat. Don't get me wrong, we probably do need a post threat, but it's still a maybe and a wing defender need is a certainty.
It doesn't really matter. We will find out more tonight and vs Atlanta. Will Josh Smith be ready for us? If so, that will be a good test. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 6:05PM #27 | |
Good post from a guy who likes VC. Nice to see that you understand we don't NEED him even though you like him. I do say that the ONLY thing we need is a PF is kinda wrong. We also need a wing defender real bad. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 6:14PM #28 | |
|
I'm not a huge Carter fan, i'm neutral about the matter, but one night doesn't sway my decision one way or the other. Everyone has off nights, everyone has good nights. To base him off of one game is silly. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 6:16PM #29 | |
|
To go along with my previous post. Vince Carter has always been the number 1 guy. Putting him alongside LeBron and Mo would give him open looks he's never seen before. He'll take less shots, but probably shoot a higher percentage. |
|
| 1 year ago :: Nov 19, 2008 - 6:18PM #30 | |
|
But what does he bring!? We don't need anymore back court scoring. He is not a great defender and h has a huge contract.
I just don't get it. If we didn't have Mo, I'd understand why the shooting would look attractive. |
|

