NBA D-LEAGUE WNBA GLOBAL TEAMS MOBILE TICKETS FANTASY NBATV STORE VIDEO
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
Post Reply
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
Getting Really sick of East talks
1 year ago  ::  Dec 02, 2008 - 6:00PM #21
Marcus
Posts: 7,740

Dec 2, 2008 -- 3:26PM, Born'N'Raised wrote:

It doesn't bother me much either.  I try not to pay much attention to the opinions of the national media.  All I really carer about is if I enjoy watching the game.  One statement I did find interesting was by Bill Simmons on "Page 2".  He basically said that the Cavs are one of three legitimate contenders for the 'ship this year.  He gives the impression that after the trade deadline he expects us to be the favorites.  Check it at the link below.  The opening paragraphs and then point number 2 halfway down the page.   http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/081126&sportCat=nba   If this is posted somewhere already, forgive me.



 


Yes, I actually read this article too.  He basically said it's the Cavs, Celts, and Lakers that have legitimate shots at the title, followed up by the Spurs, Hornets, and Mavs as long shots.


 


It was a good read and he actually covers a lot of ground.

"I ain't lost at paper, rock, scissors in 36 years and I'm only 25." - Delonte West

San Diego Chargers (6-3)

Beat those Broncos!!!
1 year ago  ::  Dec 02, 2008 - 9:48PM #22
I-H8-Boston
Posts: 908

Dec 2, 2008 -- 7:23AM, LeDan wrote:


0 for 3 against good teams? Whats your definition of good teams? We beat Denver who is 12-6 and a better record than N.O. Utah is 11-7. Atlanta 10-6. Those aren't good enough teams? Sure, Utah was banged up when we played them...but they were still winning games. We pounded Dallas at their place 100-81. They started out 1-6 but are now 8-8.


 


As if the other games don't count? Cavs will win plenty of games against "good teams" this year.




Rather than telling others who we/they beat, a somewhat better point would probally be to tell them what our record is (14-3) and that we remain as one of the top 3 teams in all of the NBA and continue to grow and get better. So what if we won to teams that are currently good or average win wise? What matters most is that we have won as many games as we have, only have 3 losses (against only top teams), are on yet another great winning streak and clearly stand out alone as one of the top 3 teams in the whole league. Their talk about who we've played and who others have played is about as annoying as the talk of LBJ leaving, maybe moreso.

1 year ago  ::  Dec 02, 2008 - 9:50PM #23
I-H8-Boston
Posts: 908

Dec 2, 2008 -- 6:00PM, Marcus wrote:


Dec 2, 2008 -- 3:26PM, Born'N'Raised wrote:

It doesn't bother me much either. I try not to pay much attention to the opinions of the national media. All I really carer about is if I enjoy watching the game. One statement I did find interesting was by Bill Simmons on "Page 2". He basically said that the Cavs are one of three legitimate contenders for the 'ship this year. He gives the impression that after the trade deadline he expects us to be the favorites. Check it at the link below. The opening paragraphs and then point number 2 halfway down the page. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/081126&sportCat=nba If this is posted somewhere already, forgive me.



 


Yes, I actually read this article too.  He basically said it's the Cavs, Celts, and Lakers that have legitimate shots at the title, followed up by the Spurs, Hornets, and Mavs as long shots.


 


It was a good read and he actually covers a lot of ground.




Once again, we remain clearly in the top 3.

1 year ago  ::  Dec 03, 2008 - 10:23AM #24
Matt
Posts: 5

If you look at the Cavs home page (my computer is being slow so i'll post the link later) there is an ESPN article that has the Cavs beating the Celtics in the Conference Finals. So it just depends. The Cavs will get their recognition sooner or later. And until then, let them win under the radar. If we win it all they have to notice us.

1 year ago  ::  Dec 03, 2008 - 4:47PM #25
Lebrons Neighbor (DG4L)
Posts: 1,154

Dec 2, 2008 -- 1:17AM, TyroneBiggums wrote:


Our first game against Boston was close, and that was without the gell the team has now. The team we got now can play bad and still win by 10 plus. Throwing it out there now. Cavs vs Lakers in the finals. I don't know how that would go though. Only matchup I am scared of.




And lebron had a huge shooting desparity (spelling?) in that game. His jumpers werent falling at all. It seems like forever ago that lebron was like 0-16 from 3's or something. Its very difficult to judge our team throughout the preseason, and then to be thrust into an away game, against the defending nba champions. (number 1 def) Our offense wasnt nearly as fluid as it is now. We could win against Boston now.

1 year ago  ::  Dec 03, 2008 - 6:42PM #26
Eddie Sulecki (grinder)
Posts: 4,543

good read

Alpha

The Ecstatics:
Eddie Sulecki
Tracy Lynn
DWreck
Tommy C
Manders
Spacejammed
ILoveGibson1
Supreme Heretic
Hatchluvah
Justin the 1st
pr26
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
Post Reply